FG Finam analyst Leonid Delitsyn notes that content undesirable

[tanjimajuha20]

According to him, everything will depend on the degree of increase in platform expenses, but operators will not raise tariffs above the annual inflation rates in the country, since otherwise they risk attracting the attention of the FAS, being fined and ultimately reducing tariffs anyway, as was recently the case with MTS. "At the same time, they will also have to prove the justification for increasing tariffs, so I believe that they will not be raised by more than 10% by the end of guatemala cell phone number list the year," says Vladimir Chernov.

for children was not an important source of income for paid TV channels, so they will not suffer significant damage. "Platforms can increase the cost of packages in proportion to the growth of costs, but the costs of ensuring restrictions will not play any significant role in them," he believes.

Owner of the Katkov.School business school, member of the RF CCI Committee on Entrepreneurship in Media Communications, member of the Association of Russian Lawyers Pavel Katkov believes that in general it is fair if different platforms are equal in terms of regulatory requirements, otherwise the "underregulated" ones receive a competitive advantage and are unreasonably exempted from fulfilling the requirement that was lawfully introduced by legislation for other platforms. "However, if you look at it from an entrepreneurial point of view, this will, of course, increase the burden on business. Now, in the context of sanctions problems and post-COVID shocks in the economy, regulation needs to be weakened, not strengthened. Yes, there may be sectors that "hurt" and will have to tighten the screws. But I do not think that paid TV channels are among them," says Pavel Katkov.

Ekaterina Tyagay, a partner at Pen & Paper, believes that given the mass distribution of content that is accessed on a paid basis, the task of minimizing risks to children's information security declared by the Federal Law is not achieved, which is what the developers of the bill point out. "Regardless of the services and channels, paid or free, through which a child gains access to such information, it is in any case potentially harmful and traumatic. That is why limiting the broadcast of such information by any device during a specific period of time can help protect a child from traumatic content. However, when it comes to measures to limit children's access to information, we should not forget that it is the parents who are responsible for raising their children and caring for their health, physical, mental, spiritual and moral development; parents are responsible for the upbringing and development of children (Article 63 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation). It is also important that, as a result, such tools for limiting access to information are not used to justify censorship," the lawyer believes.