At the same time, the connection between people's real

[sumaiyakhatun26]

" By the way, when scientists tried to model ranking by removing “biasing factors” – for example, the age of publications or an indication of their popularity – the correlation between the quality of content (nodes) and its popularity immediately increased. Researchers also describe another phenomenon separately. In social systems, agents begin to imitate the strategies of the highest-ranking individuals ("do as Buzova"). This produces a contradictory result - the general welfare of society increases, but at the same time the inequality of its members increases.


Talent and their popularity worsens, and therefore - the success so necessary list of cyprus whatsapp phone numbers for survival. Quote: "Agent-level actions motivated by the results of ranking algorithms can lead to unhealthy systemic consequences, such as reduced social mobility and low correlation between success and merit." We would like to add: “and lead to it.” People, like sheep, follow the markers of success slipped to them by algorithms, thereby creating many problems for themselves.


In conclusion, the authors of the research paper state that they challenge the ability of algorithms to evaluate people’s talent and the importance of their messages. Because algorithms are biased and create systemic consequences. The researchers call on their colleagues, as well as entrepreneurs, to develop new algorithms if they want to use quantitative methods to evaluate the talent of an individual or an organization. WE WILL PROMOTE YOUR BUSINESS Read more Either we cooperate, or the "competition" on platforms will exhaust us Naive scientists.