Why it is worth talking about management

[jarinislamfatema]

When you use Mechanism arrows, because it is people in this case who are the very tools that are involved in management issues. It is people who are engaged in getting an output from the input. For example, we describe the work of the sales department. It has a sales manager and ordinary employees. All these people from the point of view of the functional model are Mechanism (mechanisms). And if we are talking about Control arrows, then here we mean precisely control, i.

Something with which we control a function. For control, we all list of russia whatsapp phone numbers use some sets of rules and standards, so here it is appropriate to talk about instructions, job descriptions, orders, even the Civil Code, sanitary and hygienic and other rules, requirements for equipping a workplace, and so on. All this is control. Thus, control is what we focus on, what guides us, and not the decisions we make in the process of work. If the "Mechanism" is a computer program, then the control is already embedded in its code. And when writing this code, instructions, rules and other documents are used, among other things.

If we are talking about a person, it is impossible to control him from the outside. Therefore, a person will control and manage himself, but for this he needs those very instructions and rules that he will be guided by in self-control. Thus, the Mechanism, regardless of whether it is an automatic mechanism, an information system or a person, is controlled by means of the relevant documents. As you can see, everything is simple. If you translate the terms correctly, namely: Input - Input Control - Control Output - Output Mechanism - Mechanism You avoid unnecessary confusion.