General distribution of URLs for each metric

[sharminsumu]

The overall share of URLs with at least one “Poor” metric is 69.30% for mobile and 42.42% for desktop.
The overall share of URLs with all metrics in the “Poor” category is 7.97% for mobile and 1.29% for desktop.
The most optimized URLs (based on the share of URLs that score “Good” on all metrics and the median values ​​for each metric) are ranked second for mobile and second for desktop.
On mobile SERPs, from position 3 onwards, we saw a deteriorating trend for TBT and LCP, however, CLS is decreasing.
On desktop SERPs, starting from position 2, we saw a deteriorating trend for TBT and CLS, while LCP is quite stable with a small deterioration.
img-semblog
Core Web Vitals Results for Mobile
In total, 78,434 URLs were analyzed from a mobile tunisia telegram number database interface perspective, and these URLs had no issues collecting metrics.

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)
Most URLs fell within the “Good” LCP value range.

img-semblog
TBT (Total Blocking Time – FID)
Most URLs have a TBT of “Poor”.


CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)
Most URLs have a “Good” CLS

img-semblog
Combinations of metrics
Analyzing the percentages of URLs for each possible combination of metrics, we found that most URLs ( 25.6% ) have “Good” scores for LCP and CLS and “Poor” for TBT. Only 16.2% of URLs scored “Good” for all metrics.