It's the links themselves that are shared that are valuable

[sumaiyakhatun26]

Not just mentions or posts without links. Google tends to ignore any manipulative URLs that come from social networks. John Mueller gave an interview in which the answer was quite clear: social media signals do not directly affect rankings (excerpt at 19.50). Earlier, another Google employee voiced the same idea . It seems that nothing has changed since then.


However, there is a lot of indirect evidence that social media activity can affect list of cameroon whatsapp phone numbers a site's ranking. Besides this, even logically one can find two factors of influence from social networks: the more reposts, the greater the reach - the growth of backlinks; Pages with interesting and useful content will be shared by the users themselves within social networks, again with links. In the Bing search engine, social media activity definitely affects rankings.


And it’s hard to believe that Google’s algorithms are any less perfect in this regard. Verdict: Social media links alone won't give your page a boost - they need to be part of a comprehensive SEO strategy . Myth 17: Long content is better than short content. More no than yes. It would be more correct to say that the content itself matters. Google has long stated that it does not consider short or long pages as a direct ranking signal.